In a new SAFE White Paper, Martin R. Götz, Tobias H. Tröger, and Mark Wahrenburg analyze the supervisory challenges ahead for banking regulation in Europe
Target debate: Jan Krahnen responds to Clemens Fuest and Hans-Werner Sinn: We should stop extrapolating solvable problems into inevitable disasters.
Target debate: Clemens Fuest and Hans-Werner Sinn respond to Jan Krahnen's criticism. A guest commentary
The target balances generate discussions in the public and among economists who come to very different results in their analyses. An overview of the most important arguments
Matthias Goldmann: The European Court of Justice’s verdict on the bond purchases of the European Central Bank (ECB) shows the rationalizing effect of legal discourses
Peter Gomber about the reorganization of the market structure and more transparency
Jens Gal and Helmut Gründl: Time for an integrated European insurance supervision has not yet come. However, the course has already been set
The regulatory setting for bail-in does not ensure private liability and market stability at the same time
Jan Krahnen calls for further restructuring of banks and more determined liability rules
In an interview, Jan Krahnen demands state aid for a banking resolution – in addition to a bail-in
Jan Krahnen: A withdrawal from a stability-oriented policy in the U.S. would endanger the regulatory debate in the EU
Jan Krahnen greets takeover of Spanish Banco Popular and hopes that this example is followed in Italy
