The observed hump-shaped life-cycle pattern in individuals’ consumption can-not be explained by the classical consumption-savings model. The consensus explanation is that the hump is caused by constraints and unspanned risks. However, we explicitly show that the consumption hump naturally emerges in an unconstrained and risk-less setting with utility of both consumption and leisure and with educational decisions affecting future wages. The hump results from consumption and leisure being substitutes and from the implicit price of leisure being decreasing over time; more leisure means less education, which lowers future wages, and the present value of foregone wages decreases with age. Consumption is hump shaped whether the wage is hump shaped or increasing over life.
SAFE Working Paper No. 53