books

Structural Reforms in Banking: The Role of Trading

Journal of Financial Regulation, Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 66-88

Authors:
Jan Pieter Krahnen,
Felix Noth,
Ulrich Schüwer
Research Area:
Financial Intermediation
Date:
Mar 2017
Keywords:
banking, structural reforms, prohibition of proprietary trading, banking separation
Abstract:

In the wake of the recent financial crisis, significant regulatory actions have been taken aimed at limiting risks emanating from banks’ trading activities. The goal of this article is to look at the alternative reforms in the US, the UK and the EU, specifically with respect to the role of proprietary trading. Our conclusions can be summarized as follows: First, the focus on a prohibition of proprietary trading, as reflected in the Volcker Rule in the US and in the current proposal of the European Commission (Barnier proposal), is inadequate. It does not necessarily reduce risk-taking and it is likely to crowd out desired trading activities, thereby possibly affecting financial stability negatively. Second, trading separation into legally distinct or ring-fenced entities within the existing banking organizations, as suggested under the Vickers proposal for the UK and the Liikanen proposal for the EU, is a more effective solution. Separation limits cross-subsidies between banking and proprietary trading and diminishes contagion risk, while still allowing for synergies and risk management across banking, non-proprietary trading, and proprietary trading.

Link to Publication

Back to list